- 存量时代的土地利用与治理创新：迈向权能平衡的城乡发展新范式
- 文章编号：1009-6000(2026)04-0009-09
- 中图分类号：TU982.29 文献标识码：B
- Doi：10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2026.04.002
- 项目基金：国家自然科学基金面上项目“投融资视角下社区更新中环境重构的机理、效应与对策：以武汉市为例”（52378074）。
- 作者简介：郭炎，武汉大学城市设计学院，博士，硕士研究生导师，教授；
刘治杏，通信作者，武汉大学城市设计学院，硕士研究生；
林丹丹，武汉大学城市设计学院，硕士研究生；
诸葛元，武汉大学城市设计学院，硕士研究生。
- 资本属性视角下乡村“三生”空间重构的演化机理研究
- Evolutionary Mechanisms of Rural Production-Living-Ecological Space Reconstruction from a Capital Attribute Perspective: A Case Study of Huanghu Village, Wuhan
- 郭炎 刘治杏 林丹丹 诸葛元
- GUO Yan LIU Zhixin LIN Dandan ZHUGE Yuan
- 摘要：
乡村“三生”空间是实现乡村振兴和城乡融合发展的关键载体，多元资本的介入推动其空间格局不断演变与重构，但现有研究对不同属性资本作用下“三生”空间互动重构机制的认识仍有待深化。为此，文章以耐心度刻画资本属性，围绕发展型与市场型两种耐心资本，构建不同耐心度资本与政府、村集体和农民等主体互动并推动空间重构与互构的理论分析框架，以武汉市黄虎村为例进行实证研究。研究发现，黄虎村“三生”空间重构并非线性演进，而是受多类资本接续影响的非均衡、复合化、阶段性互动过程：发展型耐心资本通过制度建设与生态治理构建空间秩序，市场型耐心资本通过产业整合实现空间价值，共同塑造由单向治理到多元共建的演化路径；耐心度高低决定了资本介入的空间偏好与尺度：高耐心度资本倾向生活、生态空间的整体治理与小尺度更新，低耐心度资本则多聚焦生产、生活空间的开发利用与大尺度重组；耐心度差异塑造了不同治理模式：高耐心度资本强调共享与协作治理，而低耐心度资本偏向企业主导，易弱化村民参与并引发空间功能的错位。不同耐心度资本与乡村治理实践存在错配，亟须通过完善资本嵌入规则与协同治理机制，以促进“三生”空间的有序重构与可持续发展。 - 关键词：
乡村“三生”空间；资本驱动；资本耐心度；空间重构；武汉黄虎村 - Abstract: Rural production-living-ecological space is a key carrier for achieving rural revitalization and integrated urban-rural development. The involvement of multiple types of capital has driven the continuous evolution and restructuring of its spatial pattern. However, existing studies still lack sufficient understanding of the interactive restructuring mechanisms of production-living-ecological space under the influence of capital with different attributes. To address this, this article characterizes capital attributes in terms of patience, and, focusing on development-oriented and market-oriented patient capital, constructs a theoretical analytical framework in which capital with different degrees of patience interacts with governments, village collectives, farmers, and other actors to promote spatial restructuring and mutual reconfiguration. Taking Huanghu village in Wuhan as a case study, the findings are as follows: the restructuring of production-living-ecological space in Huanghu village is not a linear process, but an uneven, composite, and stage-based interactive process influenced by successive forms of capital. Development-oriented patient capital constructs spatial order through institutional building and ecological governance, while market-oriented patient capital realizes spatial value through industrial integration, jointly shaping an evolutionary path from one-way governance to multi-actor co-construction. The degree of patience determines the spatial preferences and scales of capital intervention: high-patience capital tends to favor holistic governance and small-scale renewal of living and ecological spaces, whereas low-patience capital mainly focuses on the development and utilization of production and living spaces and on large-scale reorganization. Differences in patience shape different governance models: high-patience capital emphasizes shared and collaborative governance, whereas low-patience capital tends to be enterprise-led, which may weaken villagers’ participation and lead to mismatches in spatial functions. There exists a mismatch between capital with different degrees of patience and rural governance practices. It is therefore necessary to improve the rules of capital embeddedness and collaborative governance mechanisms in order to promote the orderly restructuring and sustainable development of production-living-ecological space.
- Key words: rural production-living-ecological space; capital-driven; capital patience; spatial restructuring; Huanghu village, Wuhan